[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240626104648.GBZnvxmMXCZbEhoqls@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:46:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lkp@...el.com, ardb@...nel.org, brijesh.singh@....com, corbet@....net,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
jgross@...e.com, kbingham@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org, michael.roth@....com,
mingo@...hat.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
peterz@...radead.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, thomas.lendacky@....com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/64/mm: Make 5-level paging support unconditional
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:26:23PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Both Intel and AMD CPUs support 5-level paging, which is expected to
> become more widely adopted in the future.
>
> Remove CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL and ifdeffery for it to make it more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - Fix 32-bit build by wrapping p4d_set_huge() and p4d_clear_huge() in
> #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4
Is the 0day bot smart enough to detect separate v2 fixups like that and
re-test using them?
If not, you can push your tree to your repo so that it can chew on it again
and report any other potential breakages...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists