[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240626115410.GA27271@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:54:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mark.rutland@....com, ryan.roberts@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, Anshuman.Khandual@....com,
DeepakKumar.Mishra@....com, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask
On 06/26, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + struct sigaction act, act2;
> + sigset_t *set, *oldset;
...
> + set = malloc(sizeof(sigset_t *));
> + if (!set)
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("malloc");
> +
> + oldset = malloc(sizeof(sigset_t *));
Why malloc() ?
Can't you simply do
sigset_t set, oldset;
and then use sigemptyset(&set) / etc ?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists