[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qtd7pvvw7vgev5ecqjmrvcule7eqyyqxbqg4bu3k37bwhyxtzt@gdp4sjr6expl>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:17:14 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: fix panic while AP online later with kernel
parameter maxcpus=1
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0800, Zhiquan Li wrote:
> The issue was found on the platform that using "Multiprocessor Wakeup
> Structure"[1] to startup secondary CPU, which is usually used by
> encrypted guest. When restrict boot time CPU to 1 with the kernel
Nit: too many spaces after period.
> parameter "maxcpus=1" and bring other CPUs online later, there will be
> a kernel panic as below.
>
> The variable acpi_mp_wake_mailbox to hold the virtual address of MP
> Wakeup Structure mailbox will be set as readonly after initialization.
The variable acpi_mp_wake_mailbox, which holds the virtual address of
the MP Wakeup Structure mailbox, will be set as read-only after init.
> If the first AP is brought online laster, the attemption to update it
> results in panic.
If the first AP gets online later, after init, the attempt to update
the variable results in panic.
> Not like the physical address of MP Wakeup Structure mailbox, the
> readonly attribute is not necessary for its virtual address.
This sentence doesn't make sense to me. Just drop it.
> [1] Details about the MP Wakeup structure can be found in ACPI v6.4, in
> the "Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure" section.
>
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff83086978
> #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0003) - permissions violation
> PGD 3832067 P4D 3833067 PUD 3834063 PMD 80000000030001a1
> Oops: Oops: 0003 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> CPU: 0 PID: 175 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4+ #14
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
> RIP: 0010:acpi_wakeup_cpu+0xb2/0xe0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __die+0x20/0x70
> ? page_fault_oops+0x80/0x140
> ? exc_page_fault+0xdc/0x180
> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> ? _raw_read_unlock+0x18/0x40
> ? acpi_wakeup_cpu+0xb2/0xe0
> do_boot_cpu+0xeb/0x1f0
> native_kick_ap+0xcb/0x150
> ? __pfx_cpuhp_kick_ap_alive+0x10/0x10
> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2d0/0x480
> ? __pfx_trace_rb_cpu_prepare+0x10/0x10
> __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x78/0xe0
> cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x28/0x100
> _cpu_up+0xb9/0x120
> cpu_up+0x91/0xe0
> cpu_subsys_online+0x4d/0xe0
> device_online+0x5f/0x80
> online_store+0x8f/0xc0
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x125/0x1c0
> vfs_write+0x35c/0x480
> ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
> do_syscall_64+0x63/0x170
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The stack dump doesn't add value to the commit message. Drop it.
But it is worth noting that the memremap() function that initializes the
variable cannot be moved into acpi_parse_mp_wake() because memremap() is
not yet functional at this point in the boot process.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists