[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e4e71c7-9cbe-460f-85c7-8bacae8cca57@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:51:38 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate
{REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET
On 6/23/2024 1:28 PM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:14 PM Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> Generate macros {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in the newly added AWK
>> script that generates the required and disabled feature mask header.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
>> ---
> Checking NCAPINTS isn't necessary anymore. It was needed when these
> macros had to be manually updated, but now if cpufeatures.h changes
> this header will be regenerated.
>
>> }
>>
>> printf "#endif /* _ASM_X86_FEATUREMASKS_H */\n";
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>
> Otherwise, it looks good.
>
Do you mind to give a review-by?
Thanks!
Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists