[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240627030026.GAZnzVyitzWW6nE_s8@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:00:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:AMD PSTATE DRIVER" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpu/amd: Clarify amd_get_highest_perf()
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:18:17PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> And then patch 2 or patch 3 change the "default" return to 166 and if there
> is functional issues then they need to be special cased.
Sounds ok to me. Keep the whole logic in one place. Sure.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists