[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zn2iUQ4xj0ANHHs6@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:33:05 +0000
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Friedrich Vock <friedrich.vock@....de>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/page_counter: Move calculating protection
values to page_counter
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 05:47:20PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It's a lot of math, and there is nothing memcontrol specific about it.
> This makes it easier to use inside of the drm cgroup controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
LGTM and I believe it's a good thing to do even without taking the rest
of the series into account.
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists