lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:07:08 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"open list:FREESCALE DSPI DRIVER" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: dt-bindings: fsl-dspi: add dmas and dma-names
 properties

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:53:38AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 04:33:08PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > Add dmas and dma-names properties because dspi support dma transfer.
> > Fix below warnings:
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-sl28-var1.dtb: spi@...0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('dma-names', 'dmas', 'little-endian' were unexpected)
> >         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/fsl,dspi.yaml#
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > ---
> 
> For the contents:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> 
> and FWIW, I noticed this as well, but didn't want to put yet another
> roadblock in the conversion of a binding which was way overdue.
> I was planning to send a patch as well, once the binding was merged.
> 
> But... to whose tree is this targeted? I only got a notification
> from Shawn for patch 3/3 (the device tree change), but none for the
> acceptance of the other 2 patches.

This patch base on the below patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240624-ls_qspi-v4-0-3d1c6f5005bf@nxp.com/T/#t

Sorry, I miss understand 3 patches already picked. Actually only pick 3rd
one.

Frank


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ