[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dyh3vxosjjfztgwgpb5jtoqhzfyf5jyfndaujqoslepzvbet4o@kx6xaotzazcs>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:08:18 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Gokul Sriram P <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com, ohad@...ery.com,
robh@...nel.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org, gokulsri@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add PRNG proxy clock
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 03:31:01PM GMT, Gokul Sriram P wrote:
>
> On 6/27/2024 12:47 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:03:30AM GMT, Gokul Sriram P wrote:
> > > On 6/22/2024 2:38 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:16:52PM GMT, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote:
> > > > > PRNG clock is needed by the secure PIL, support for the same
> > > > > is added in subsequent patches.
> > > > Which 'same'?
> > > > What is 'secure PIL'?
> > > will elaborate in the updated version.
> > > To answer your question, secure PIL is signed PIL image which only
> > > TrustZone can authenticate and load.
> > Fine. So, the current driver can not load WCSS firmware on IPQ8074, is
> > that correct? Or was there some kind of firmware interface change? The
> > driver was added in 2018, so I can only hope that at that point it
> > worked. Could you please explain, what happened?
> The existing wcss driver can load unsigned PIL images without the
> involvement of TrustZone. That works even now.
> With the current change, we are trying to add signed PIL as an option based
> on "wcss->need_mem_protection" if set. For signed PIL alone, we send a PAS
> request to TrustZone to authenticate and load.
I see that you are enabling it unconditionally for IPQ8074. How is it
going to work?
> I also just noticed that Bjorn had suggested to submit a new driver for the
> PAS based IPQ WCSS instead of overloading this driver. Will also address
> that and post a new driver in updated revision.
>
> Regards,
> Gokul
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Prakash V <quic_nprakash@...cinc.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists