[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240627111445.29751-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:14:48 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: testunit: discard write requests while old command is running
When clearing registers on new write requests was added, the protection
for currently running commands was missed leading to concurrent access
to the testunit registers. Check the flag beforehand.
Fixes: b39ab96aa894 ("i2c: testunit: add support for block process calls")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c
index a5dcbc3c2c14..ca43e98cae1b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-testunit.c
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ static int i2c_slave_testunit_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
break;
case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+ if (test_bit(TU_FLAG_IN_PROCESS, &tu->flags))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
memset(tu->regs, 0, TU_NUM_REGS);
tu->reg_idx = 0;
break;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists