[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240627124209.GK2494510@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:42:09 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"ajones@...tanamicro.com" <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Reuse file f_inode as vfio device inode
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 05:51:01PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > > > This doesn't seem right.. There is only one device but multiple file
> > > > can be opened on that device.
> Maybe we can put this assignment to vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd() after
> vfio_df_open() makes sure device->open_count is 1.
Yeah, that seems better.
Logically it would be best if all places set the inode once the
inode/FD has been made to be the one and only way to access it.
> BTW, in group path, what's the benefit of allowing multiple open of device?
I don't know, the thing that opened the first FD can just dup it, no
idea why two different FDs would be useful. It is something we removed
in the cdev flow
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists