linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: Add support for M5441x NFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV6z6OST=U3cvt3NRe3nj7DKCf+0O4v9s14ZV-j2v=qrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:01:17 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, 
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: Add support for M5441x NFC

Hi Jean-Michel,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 6:25 PM Jean-Michel Hautbois
<jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org> wrote:
> The vf610_nfc driver is also the one which should be used for the
> coldfire series. Sadly, these device don't support device-tree and so we
> need to do a few modifications:
> - Adapt the probe to use pdata if available
> - Add a new variant as there is a small part to adapt in
>   vf610_nfc_select_target()
> - Add the corresponding missing register definitions
>
> Tested successfully on a 54418 custom board with a raw NAND:
> [    2.640000] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc
> [    2.650000] nand: Micron MT29F4G08ABADAWP
> [    2.650000] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c
> @@ -810,6 +840,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         struct vf610_nfc *nfc;
>         struct mtd_info *mtd;
>         struct nand_chip *chip;
> +       struct nand_chip *pdata;
>         struct device_node *child;

As reported by the robot, this is now unused.

>         int err;
>         int irq;
> @@ -820,30 +851,53 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         nfc->dev = &pdev->dev;
>         chip = &nfc->chip;
> +       pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> +       if (pdata)
> +               *chip = *pdata;
> +
>         mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>
>         mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>         mtd->dev.parent = nfc->dev;
> -       mtd->name = DRV_NAME;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * We keep the MTD name unchanged to avoid breaking platforms
> +        * where the MTD cmdline parser is used and the bootloader
> +        * has not been updated to use the new naming scheme.
> +        */
> +       if (!nfc->dev->of_node)
> +               mtd->name = "NAND";
> +       else
> +               mtd->name = DRV_NAME;
>
>         irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>         if (irq < 0)
>                 return irq;
>
>         nfc->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> -       if (IS_ERR(nfc->regs))
> +       if (IS_ERR(nfc->regs)) {
> +               dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to map registers!\n");
>                 return PTR_ERR(nfc->regs);
> +       }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF

Do you need all the #ifdeffery?

>         nfc->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);

Perhaps replace by devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() instead?

>         if (IS_ERR(nfc->clk)) {
>                 dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to get and enable clock!\n");
>                 return PTR_ERR(nfc->clk);
>         }
>
> -       nfc->variant = (enum vf610_nfc_variant)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> -       if (!nfc->variant)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> +       const void *data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> +       nfc->variant = (enum vf610_nfc_variant)data;
> +       if (!nfc->variant) {
> +               dev_err(nfc->dev, "No variant data found!\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +#else
> +       nfc->variant = (enum vf610_nfc_variant)platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>         for_each_available_child_of_node(nfc->dev->of_node, child) {

for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(...), so the child variable
no longer needs to be declared at the top.

>                 if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "fsl,vf610-nfc-nandcs")) {
>
> @@ -862,6 +916,10 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 dev_err(nfc->dev, "NAND chip sub-node missing!\n");
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
> +#else
> +       nfc->clk = NULL;
> +       mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +#endif
>
>         chip->options |= NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE;
>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds