[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c41b19ac-6bf9-4f30-8c00-0cf63246d825@web.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:02:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [v3] drm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in
nouveau_connector_get_modes
> Because the responses you have been given read like a bot,
I find it interesting that you interpret provided information
in such a direction.
> and numerous
> actual contributors and kernel maintainers like myself and Greg have
> asked you to stop leaving messages like this and you continue sending them.
I hope still that further information can be handled in constructive ways.
> I promise you, maintainers are more then capable of being able to
> tell a contributor when they need to improve the summary they've
> provided in a git commit.
There are usual possibilities.
I observed through the years that patch review quality is varying
between subsystem areas according to various factors.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists