| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240628-mcp251xfd-workaround-erratum-6-v4-7-53586f168524@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:40:31 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
Stefan Althöfer <Stefan.Althoefer@...ztec.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] can: mcp251xfd: rx: add workaround for erratum
DS80000789E 6 of mcp2518fd
This patch tries to works around erratum DS80000789E 6 of the
mcp2518fd, the other variants of the chip family (mcp2517fd and
mcp251863) are probably also affected.
In the bad case, the driver reads a too large head index. In the
original code, the driver always trusted the read value, which caused
old, already processed CAN frames or new, incompletely written CAN
frames to be (re-)processed.
To work around this issue, keep a per FIFO timestamp [1] of the last
valid received CAN frame and compare against the timestamp of every
received CAN frame. If an old CAN frame is detected, abort the
iteration and mark the number of valid CAN frames as processed in the
chip by incrementing the FIFO's tail index.
Further tests showed that this workaround can recognize old CAN
frames, but a small time window remains in which partially written CAN
frames [2] are not recognized but then processed. These CAN frames
have the correct data and time stamps, but the DLC has not yet been
updated.
[1] As the raw timestamp overflows every 107 seconds (at the usual
clock rate of 40 MHz) convert it to nanoseconds with the
timecounter framework and use this to detect stale CAN frames.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/BL3PR11MB64844C1C95CA3BDADAE4D8CCFBC99@BL3PR11MB6484.namprd11.prod.outlook.com [2]
Reported-by: Stefan Althöfer <Stefan.Althoefer@...ztec.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/FR0P281MB1966273C216630B120ABB6E197E89@FR0P281MB1966.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Tested-by: Stefan Althöfer <Stefan.Althoefer@...ztec.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c | 1 +
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
index b308a375e26e..8464fc4f37d0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ mcp251xfd_ring_init_rx(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv, u16 *base, u8 *fifo_nr)
int i, j;
mcp251xfd_for_each_rx_ring(priv, rx_ring, i) {
+ rx_ring->last_valid = timecounter_read(&priv->tc);
rx_ring->head = 0;
rx_ring->tail = 0;
rx_ring->base = *base;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
index a79e6c661ecc..fe897f3e4c12 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ mcp251xfd_hw_rx_obj_to_skb(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
if (!(hw_rx_obj->flags & MCP251XFD_OBJ_FLAGS_RTR))
memcpy(cfd->data, hw_rx_obj->data, cfd->len);
-
- mcp251xfd_skb_set_timestamp_raw(priv, skb, hw_rx_obj->ts);
}
static int
@@ -171,8 +169,26 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->ndev->stats;
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct canfd_frame *cfd;
+ u64 timestamp;
int err;
+ /* According to mcp2518fd erratum DS80000789E 6. the FIFOCI
+ * bits of a FIFOSTA register, here the RX FIFO head index
+ * might be corrupted and we might process past the RX FIFO's
+ * head into old CAN frames.
+ *
+ * Compare the timestamp of currently processed CAN frame with
+ * last valid frame received. Abort with -EBADMSG if an old
+ * CAN frame is detected.
+ */
+ timestamp = timecounter_cyc2time(&priv->tc, hw_rx_obj->ts);
+ if (timestamp <= ring->last_valid) {
+ stats->rx_fifo_errors++;
+
+ return -EBADMSG;
+ }
+ ring->last_valid = timestamp;
+
if (hw_rx_obj->flags & MCP251XFD_OBJ_FLAGS_FDF)
skb = alloc_canfd_skb(priv->ndev, &cfd);
else
@@ -183,6 +199,7 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
return 0;
}
+ mcp251xfd_skb_set_timestamp(skb, timestamp);
mcp251xfd_hw_rx_obj_to_skb(priv, hw_rx_obj, skb);
err = can_rx_offload_queue_timestamp(&priv->offload, skb, hw_rx_obj->ts);
if (err)
@@ -265,7 +282,16 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
err = mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(priv, ring,
(void *)hw_rx_obj +
i * ring->obj_size);
- if (err)
+
+ /* -EBADMSG means we're affected by mcp2518fd
+ * erratum DS80000789E 6., i.e. the timestamp
+ * in the RX object is older that the last
+ * valid received CAN frame. Don't process any
+ * further and mark processed frames as good.
+ */
+ if (err == -EBADMSG)
+ return mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring_uinc(priv, ring, i);
+ else if (err)
return err;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
index 453a2b193c75..d32ece3d7aee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
@@ -552,6 +552,9 @@ struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring {
unsigned int head;
unsigned int tail;
+ /* timestamp of the last valid received CAN frame */
+ u64 last_valid;
+
u16 base;
u8 nr;
u8 fifo_nr;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists