[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171961447393.238177.16381669170137224353.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:55:30 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>, Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce distinct macros for
GP/fixed counter max number
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:17:55 +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Refine the macros which define maximum General Purpose (GP) and fixed
> counter numbers.
>
> Currently the macro KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC is used to represent the
> maximum supported General Purpose (GP) counter number ambiguously across
> Intel and AMD platforms. This would cause issues if AMD begins to support
> more GP counters than Intel.
>
> [...]
Applied 1 to kvm-x86 pmu, and 2 to selftests. Thanks!
[1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce distinct macros for GP/fixed counter max number
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/f287bef6ddc2
[2/2] KVM: selftests: Print the seed for the guest pRNG iff it has changed
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/ea09ace3f8f3
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists