| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:17:11 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf topdown: Correct leader selection with sample_read
enabled
On 6/27/2024 11:11 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
> Hi Dapeng,
>
> On 2024-06-14 5:39 p.m., Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> Addresses an issue where, in the absence of a topdown metrics event
>> within a sampling group, the slots event was incorrectly bypassed as
>> the sampling leader when sample_read was enabled.
>>
>> perf record -e '{slots,branches}:S' -c 10000 -vv sleep 1
>>
>> In this case, the slots event should be sampled as leader but the
>> branches event is sampled in fact like the verbose output shows.
>>
>> perf_event_attr:
>> type 4 (cpu)
>> size 168
>> config 0x400 (slots)
>> sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
>> read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
>> disabled 1
>> sample_id_all 1
>> exclude_guest 1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> perf_event_attr:
>> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
>> size 168
>> config 0x4 (PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS)
>> { sample_period, sample_freq } 10000
>> sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
>> read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
>> sample_id_all 1
>> exclude_guest 1
>>
>> The sample period of slots event instead of branches event is reset to
>> 0.
>>
>> This fix ensures the slots event remains the leader under these
>> conditions.
> This should be just one of the issues with the slots/topdown related
> sampling read.
>
> If adding one more topdown event, the sampling read may still be broken.
> perf record -e "{slots,instructions,topdown-retiring}:S" -C0 sleep 1
> WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
> for event (topdown-retiring).
>
> That may require Yanfei's patch.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240411144852.2507143-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com/
Yes, we need this patch. It would fix the error what you see.
>
> Please give it try and summarize all the required patches for the
> topdown sampling read feature.
I would talk with Yanfei, and collect all required patches into a whole
patchset. This would make the patch review more easily.
>
> Besides, we need a test for the sampling read as well.
> Ian has provided a very good base. Please add a topdown sampling read
> case on top of it as well.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fUkg-cAXTb+3wbFOQCfdXgpQeZw40XHjfrNFbnBD=NMXg@mail.gmail.com/
Sure. I would look at it and add a test case.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
>> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
>> index 3f9a267d4501..aea6896bbb57 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> #include "api/fs/fs.h"
>> #include "util/evsel.h"
>> +#include "util/evlist.h"
>> #include "util/pmu.h"
>> #include "util/pmus.h"
>> #include "util/topdown.h"
>> @@ -31,6 +32,32 @@ bool topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics(void)
>> return has_perf_metrics;
>> }
>>
>> +static int perf_pmus__topdown_event(void *vstate, struct pmu_event_info *info)
>> +{
>> + if (!strcmp(info->name, (char *)vstate))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_topdown_metric_event(struct evsel *event)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_pmu *pmu;
>> +
>> + if (!topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics())
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (event->core.attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + pmu = perf_pmus__find_by_type(PERF_TYPE_RAW);
>> + if (pmu && perf_pmu__for_each_event(pmu, false, event->name,
>> + perf_pmus__topdown_event))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define TOPDOWN_SLOTS 0x0400
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -41,11 +68,22 @@ bool topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics(void)
>> */
>> bool arch_topdown_sample_read(struct evsel *leader)
>> {
>> + struct evsel *event;
>> +
>> if (!evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(leader))
>> return false;
>>
>> - if (leader->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS)
>> - return true;
>> + if (leader->core.attr.config != TOPDOWN_SLOTS)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If slots event as leader event but no topdown metric events in group,
>> + * slots event should still sample as leader.
>> + */
>> + evlist__for_each_entry(leader->evlist, event) {
>> + if (event != leader && is_topdown_metric_event(event))
>> + return true;
>> + }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> base-commit: 92e5605a199efbaee59fb19e15d6cc2103a04ec2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists