[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <fbd421a6-cf37-49ab-bdbe-6128a7cae8be@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 01:33:06 +0100
From: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MIPS: Implement ieee754 NAN2008 emulation mode
在2024年6月27日六月 下午8:54,Maciej W. Rozycki写道:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>> >> @@ -318,6 +318,10 @@ void mips_set_personality_nan(struct arch_elf_state *state)
>> >> t->thread.fpu.fcr31 = c->fpu_csr31;
>> >> switch (state->nan_2008) {
>> >> case 0:
>> >> + if (!(c->fpu_msk31 & FPU_CSR_NAN2008))
>> >> + t->thread.fpu.fcr31 &= ~FPU_CSR_NAN2008;
>> >> + if (!(c->fpu_msk31 & FPU_CSR_ABS2008))
>> >> + t->thread.fpu.fcr31 &= ~FPU_CSR_ABS2008;
>> >
>> > why is this needed?
>>
>> Because t->thread.fpu.fcr31 comes from c->fpu_csr31, in this case we the default
>> value of c->fpu_csr31 is read from hardware and we don't know what would that be.
>
> But it has always been like this. What has changed with your patch that
> you need to mask the bit out now?
After this patch kernel's copy of t->thread.fpu.fcr31 can disagree with hardware.
When disagree happens, we trigger emulation.
Before that patch for nan legacy binary running on nan2008 CPU t->thread.fpu.fcr31
will still be nan2008 (for ieee754=relaxed) so that's not relevant.
Thanks
>
> Maciej
--
- Jiaxun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists