linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 0/2] Makefile: rust-analyzer better error handling, documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240628004356.1384486-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:43:54 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
	Finn Behrens <me@...enk.dev>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Makefile: rust-analyzer better error handling, documentation

Changes since v2:

1) Used wording suggested by Miguel Ojeda (thanks!) for the 
   documentation patch.

2) Added review, testing, ack tags.

Finn Behrens, thanks for your reviews, and please note that out of an
excess of caution, I've only applied your reviewed-by tag to patch 2/2.
For patch 1/2, the wording changed a lot after you reviewed it, so I
couldn't quite convince myself that the review was still fair to claim.

Changes since v1:

1) Thanks to Alice Ryhl for testing and reviewing v1. I had to drop both
   of those tags for this v2, because even though it is small, it's
   different enough to invalidate both, unfortunately.

2) Adopted Miguel Ojeda's suggestion of letting rust_is_available.sh
   report its results directly, thus improving the output, while also
   simplifying the patch.

3) As requested by Miguel, split out some new comment documentation
   for the rust-analyzer target into its own patch.

John Hubbard (2):
  Makefile: rust-analyzer target: better error handling
  Makefile: improve comment documentation for the rust-analyzer target

 Makefile | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

base-commit: 6d6444ba82053c716fb5ac83346202659023044e
-- 
2.45.2