[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d1fea29-f6c2-41a8-a01f-52f6d20536f5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:51:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
bgoswami@...cinc.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, elder@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, caleb.connolly@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: add LPASS LPI pin
controller
On 28/06/2024 09:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 02:07:13AM GMT, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>> Add the Low Power Audio SubSystem Low Power Island (LPASS LPI)
>> pin controller device node required for audio subsystem on
>> Qualcomm QRB4210 RB2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
>> index c49aca3d0772..3a9fb1780c90 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,apr.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>>
>> / {
>> @@ -809,6 +810,21 @@ data-pins {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sm4250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
>
> Is it so? Or should it be qcom,sm6115-lpass-lpi-pinctrl instead?
Eh, now I am confused as well... There was so much talk about Srini's
patchset that I assumed it is the same device. Why were you testing sm4250?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists