linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add MSM8953 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6b8df30-cd81-489b-801a-afd8fceaf41d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:41:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
 Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add MSM8953 driver

On 28/06/2024 11:32, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> On 27.06.24 18:08, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>> From: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
>>
>> Add driver for interconnect busses found in MSM8953 based platforms.
>> The topology consists of four NoCs that are partially controlled by a
>> RPM processor.
>>
>> Note that one of NoCs (System NoC) has a counterpart (System NoC MM)
>> that is modelled as child device to avoid resource conflicts, since it
>> uses same MMIO space for configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig   |    9 +
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile  |    2 +
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8953.c | 1325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 1336 insertions(+)
>>
> [..]
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_node * const msm8953_pcnoc_nodes[] = {
>> +	[MAS_SPDM] = &mas_spdm,
>> +	[MAS_BLSP_1] = &mas_blsp_1,
>> +	[MAS_BLSP_2] = &mas_blsp_2,
>> +	[MAS_USB3] = &mas_usb3,
>> +	[MAS_CRYPTO] = &mas_crypto,
>> +	[MAS_SDCC_1] = &mas_sdcc_1,
>> +	[MAS_SDCC_2] = &mas_sdcc_2,
>> +	[MAS_SNOC_PCNOC] = &mas_snoc_pcnoc,
>> +	[PCNOC_M_0] = &pcnoc_m_0,
>> +	[PCNOC_M_1] = &pcnoc_m_1,
>> +	[PCNOC_INT_1] = &pcnoc_int_1,
>> +	[PCNOC_INT_2] = &pcnoc_int_2,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_0] = &pcnoc_s_0,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_1] = &pcnoc_s_1,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_2] = &pcnoc_s_2,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_3] = &pcnoc_s_3,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_4] = &pcnoc_s_4,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_6] = &pcnoc_s_6,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_7] = &pcnoc_s_7,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_8] = &pcnoc_s_8,
>> +	[PCNOC_S_9] = &pcnoc_s_9,
>> +	[SLV_SPDM] = &slv_spdm,
>> +	[SLV_PDM] = &slv_pdm,
>> +	[SLV_TCSR] = &slv_tcsr,
>> +	[SLV_SNOC_CFG] = &slv_snoc_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_TLMM] = &slv_tlmm,
>> +	[SLV_MESSAGE_RAM] = &slv_message_ram,
>> +	[SLV_BLSP_1] = &slv_blsp_1,
>> +	[SLV_BLSP_2] = &slv_blsp_2,
>> +	[SLV_PRNG] = &slv_prng,
>> +	[SLV_CAMERA_SS_CFG] = &slv_camera_ss_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_DISP_SS_CFG] = &slv_disp_ss_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_VENUS_CFG] = &slv_venus_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_GPU_CFG] = &slv_gpu_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_SDCC_1] = &slv_sdcc_1,
>> +	[SLV_SDCC_2] = &slv_sdcc_2,
>> +	[SLV_CRYPTO_0_CFG] = &slv_crypto_0_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_PMIC_ARB] = &slv_pmic_arb,
>> +	[SLV_USB3] = &slv_usb3,
>> +	[SLV_IPA_CFG] = &slv_ipa_cfg,
>> +	[SLV_TCU] = &slv_tcu,
>> +	[SLV_PCNOC_SNOC] = &slv_pcnoc_snoc,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const char * const msm8953_pcnoc_bus_clocks[] = {
>> +	"bus", "bus_a"
>> +};
> 
> This seems to be unused?

Heh, was it ever compiled with W=1? I double checked and easily see a
warning...

Best regards,
Krzysztof