linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:06:35 +0300
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: chris.brandt@...esas.com, andi.shyti@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, magnus.damm@...il.com,
 mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
 wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus



On 28.06.2024 12:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:14 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>
>> Fast mode plus is available on most of the IP variants that RIIC driver
>> is working with. The exception is (according to HW manuals of the SoCs
>> where this IP is available) the Renesas RZ/A1H. For this, patch
>> introduces the struct riic_of_data::fast_mode_plus.
>>
>> Fast mode plus was tested on RZ/G3S, RZ/G2{L,UL,LC}, RZ/Five by
>> instantiating the RIIC frequency to 1MHz and issuing i2c reads on the
>> fast mode plus capable devices (and the i2c clock frequency was checked on
>> RZ/G3S).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
>> @@ -407,6 +413,9 @@ static int riic_init_hw(struct riic_dev *riic)
>>         riic_writeb(riic, 0, RIIC_ICSER);
>>         riic_writeb(riic, ICMR3_ACKWP | ICMR3_RDRFS, RIIC_ICMR3);
>>
>> +       if (info->fast_mode_plus && t->bus_freq_hz == I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ)
>> +               riic_clear_set_bit(riic, 0, ICFER_FMPE, RIIC_ICFER);
> 
> Unless FM+ is specified, RIIC_ICFER is never written to.
> Probably the register should always be initialized, also to make sure
> the FMPE bit is cleared when it was set by the boot loader, but FM+
> is not to be used.

OK, that's a good point.

Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea

> 
> 
>> +
>>         riic_clear_set_bit(riic, ICCR1_IICRST, 0, RIIC_ICCR1);
>>
>>         pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
>