linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: dt-bindings: fsl-dspi: add dmas and dma-names properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:38:45 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"open list:FREESCALE DSPI DRIVER" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: dt-bindings: fsl-dspi: add dmas and dma-names
 properties

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:53:38AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:

> and FWIW, I noticed this as well, but didn't want to put yet another
> roadblock in the conversion of a binding which was way overdue.
> I was planning to send a patch as well, once the binding was merged.

If I've seen a report that a new binding introduces errors then I'm very
unlikely to apply it, I'd guess that's true for other maintainers too -
it's probably best to fix reported errors promptly by default.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)