[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240628141542.GA124261@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:15:42 -0400
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
avadhut.naik@....com, john.allen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/topology: Export helper to get CPU number
from APIC ID
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 10:37:22AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:42:12PM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > But would/could we have SMP support without X86_LOCAL_APIC?
>
> Look at how X86_LOCAL_APIC is defined in Kconfig.
>
Thanks for the tip. It looks to me that SMP and X86_LOCAL_APIC are
generally independent.
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists