lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l3gmo2h6qtfvrwyof7qsiduwid65wqs7xbncdabpgrvyun7ifx@w5rod4je4pgm>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:53:34 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/9] mm: memcg: put struct task_struct::memcg_in_oom
 under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 09:03:16PM GMT, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> The memcg_in_oom field of the struct task_struct is not used by
> the cgroup v2's memory controller, so it can be happily compiled out
> if CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ