[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zn9oEjsm_1aWb35J@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:49:06 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.11 1/2] sched_ext: Take out ->priq and
->flags from scx_dsq_node
struct scx_dsq_node contains two data structure nodes to link the containing
task to a DSQ and a flags field that is protected by the lock of the
associated DSQ. One reason why they are grouped into a struct is to use the
type independently as a cursor node when iterating tasks on a DSQ. However,
when iterating, the cursor only needs to be linked on the FIFO list and the
rb_node part ends up inflating the size of the iterator data structure
unnecessarily making it potentially too expensive to place it on stack.
Take ->priq and ->flags out of scx_dsq_node and put them in sched_ext_entity
as ->dsq_priq and ->dsq_flags, respectively. scx_dsq_node is renamed to
scx_dsq_list_node and the field names are renamed accordingly. This will
help implementing DSQ task iterator that can be allocated on stack.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
include/linux/sched/ext.h | 10 ++++----
init/init_task.c | 2 -
kernel/sched/ext.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched/ext.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
@@ -121,10 +121,8 @@ enum scx_kf_mask {
__SCX_KF_TERMINAL = SCX_KF_ENQUEUE | SCX_KF_SELECT_CPU | SCX_KF_REST,
};
-struct scx_dsq_node {
- struct list_head list; /* dispatch order */
- struct rb_node priq; /* p->scx.dsq_vtime order */
- u32 flags; /* SCX_TASK_DSQ_* flags */
+struct scx_dsq_list_node {
+ struct list_head node;
};
/*
@@ -133,7 +131,9 @@ struct scx_dsq_node {
*/
struct sched_ext_entity {
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq;
- struct scx_dsq_node dsq_node; /* protected by dsq lock */
+ struct scx_dsq_list_node dsq_list; /* dispatch order */
+ struct rb_node dsq_priq; /* p->scx.dsq_vtime order */
+ u32 dsq_flags; /* protected by DSQ lock */
u32 flags; /* protected by rq lock */
u32 weight;
s32 sticky_cpu;
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task __aligned(L
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
.scx = {
- .dsq_node.list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.scx.dsq_node.list),
+ .dsq_list.node = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.scx.dsq_list.node),
.sticky_cpu = -1,
.holding_cpu = -1,
.runnable_node = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_task.scx.runnable_node),
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1360,9 +1360,9 @@ static bool scx_dsq_priq_less(struct rb_
const struct rb_node *node_b)
{
const struct task_struct *a =
- container_of(node_a, struct task_struct, scx.dsq_node.priq);
+ container_of(node_a, struct task_struct, scx.dsq_priq);
const struct task_struct *b =
- container_of(node_b, struct task_struct, scx.dsq_node.priq);
+ container_of(node_b, struct task_struct, scx.dsq_priq);
return time_before64(a->scx.dsq_vtime, b->scx.dsq_vtime);
}
@@ -1378,9 +1378,9 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_
{
bool is_local = dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_node.list));
- WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_node.flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) ||
- !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_node.priq));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) ||
+ !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq));
if (!is_local) {
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
@@ -1419,21 +1419,21 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_
scx_ops_error("DSQ ID 0x%016llx already had FIFO-enqueued tasks",
dsq->id);
- p->scx.dsq_node.flags |= SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ;
- rb_add(&p->scx.dsq_node.priq, &dsq->priq, scx_dsq_priq_less);
+ p->scx.dsq_flags |= SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ;
+ rb_add(&p->scx.dsq_priq, &dsq->priq, scx_dsq_priq_less);
/*
* Find the previous task and insert after it on the list so
* that @dsq->list is vtime ordered.
*/
- rbp = rb_prev(&p->scx.dsq_node.priq);
+ rbp = rb_prev(&p->scx.dsq_priq);
if (rbp) {
struct task_struct *prev =
container_of(rbp, struct task_struct,
- scx.dsq_node.priq);
- list_add(&p->scx.dsq_node.list, &prev->scx.dsq_node.list);
+ scx.dsq_priq);
+ list_add(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &prev->scx.dsq_list.node);
} else {
- list_add(&p->scx.dsq_node.list, &dsq->list);
+ list_add(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dsq->list);
}
} else {
/* a FIFO DSQ shouldn't be using PRIQ enqueuing */
@@ -1442,9 +1442,9 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_
dsq->id);
if (enq_flags & (SCX_ENQ_HEAD | SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT))
- list_add(&p->scx.dsq_node.list, &dsq->list);
+ list_add(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dsq->list);
else
- list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_node.list, &dsq->list);
+ list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &dsq->list);
}
dsq_mod_nr(dsq, 1);
@@ -1487,18 +1487,18 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_
static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
{
- if (p->scx.dsq_node.flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) {
- rb_erase(&p->scx.dsq_node.priq, &dsq->priq);
- RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_node.priq);
- p->scx.dsq_node.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ;
+ if (p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) {
+ rb_erase(&p->scx.dsq_priq, &dsq->priq);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq);
+ p->scx.dsq_flags &= ~SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ;
}
- list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_node.list);
+ list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
}
static bool task_linked_on_dsq(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_node.list);
+ return !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
}
static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1523,8 +1523,8 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
/*
- * Now that we hold @dsq->lock, @p->holding_cpu and @p->scx.dsq_node
- * can't change underneath us.
+ * Now that we hold @dsq->lock, @p->holding_cpu and @p->scx.dsq_* can't
+ * change underneath us.
*/
if (p->scx.holding_cpu < 0) {
/* @p must still be on @dsq, dequeue */
@@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct rq
/* @dsq is locked and @p is on this rq */
WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0);
task_unlink_from_dsq(p, dsq);
- list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_node.list, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
+ list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &rq->scx.local_dsq.list);
dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1);
dsq_mod_nr(&rq->scx.local_dsq, 1);
p->scx.dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
@@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@ retry:
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(p, &dsq->list, scx.dsq_node.list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(p, &dsq->list, scx.dsq_list.node) {
struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
if (rq == task_rq) {
@@ -2628,7 +2628,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq
static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
{
return list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.local_dsq.list,
- struct task_struct, scx.dsq_node.list);
+ struct task_struct, scx.dsq_list.node);
}
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
@@ -3308,8 +3308,8 @@ void init_scx_entity(struct sched_ext_en
*/
memset(scx, 0, offsetof(struct sched_ext_entity, tasks_node));
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scx->dsq_node.list);
- RB_CLEAR_NODE(&scx->dsq_node.priq);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scx->dsq_list.node);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&scx->dsq_priq);
scx->sticky_cpu = -1;
scx->holding_cpu = -1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scx->runnable_node);
@@ -4158,7 +4158,7 @@ static void scx_dump_task(struct seq_buf
jiffies_delta_msecs(p->scx.runnable_at, dctx->at_jiffies));
dump_line(s, " scx_state/flags=%u/0x%x dsq_flags=0x%x ops_state/qseq=%lu/%lu",
scx_get_task_state(p), p->scx.flags & ~SCX_TASK_STATE_MASK,
- p->scx.dsq_node.flags, ops_state & SCX_OPSS_STATE_MASK,
+ p->scx.dsq_flags, ops_state & SCX_OPSS_STATE_MASK,
ops_state >> SCX_OPSS_QSEQ_SHIFT);
dump_line(s, " sticky/holding_cpu=%d/%d dsq_id=%s dsq_vtime=%llu",
p->scx.sticky_cpu, p->scx.holding_cpu, dsq_id_buf,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists