linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 02:52:25 +0000
From: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@...info.com>
To: helgaas@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	lkp@...el.com,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
	oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	zhoushengqing@...info.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:58:56AM +0000, Zhou Shengqing wrote:
> > This patch add 1k granularity for intel root port bridge.Intel latest
> > server CPU support 1K granularity,And there is an BIOS setup item named
> > "EN1K",but linux doesn't support it. if an IIO has 5 IOU (SPR has 5 IOUs)
> > all are bifurcated 2x8.In a 2P server system,There are 20 P2P bridges
> > present.if keep 4K granularity allocation,it need 20*4=80k io space,
> > exceeding 64k.I test it in a 16*nvidia 4090s system under intel eaglestrem
> > platform.There are six 4090s that cannot be allocated I/O resources.
> > So I applied this patch.And I found a similar implementation in quirks.c,
> > but it only targets the Intel P64H2 platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@...info.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 5fbabb4e3425..909962795311 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -461,6 +461,9 @@ static void pci_read_bridge_windows(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> >  	u32 buses;
> >  	u16 io;
> >  	u32 pmem, tmp;
> > +	u16 ven_id, dev_id;
> > +	u16 en1k = 0;
> > +	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> >  	struct resource res;
> >  
> >  	pci_read_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, &buses);
> > @@ -478,6 +481,26 @@ static void pci_read_bridge_windows(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> >  	}
> >  	if (io) {
> >  		bridge->io_window = 1;
> > +		if (pci_is_root_bus(bridge->bus)) {
> > +			list_for_each_entry(dev, &bridge->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > +				pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &ven_id);
> > +				pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_DEVICE_ID, &dev_id);
> > +				if (ven_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL && dev_id == 0x09a2) {
> > +					/*IIO MISC Control offset 0x1c0*/
> > +					pci_read_config_word(dev, 0x1c0, &en1k);
> > +				}
> > +			}
> > +		/*
> > +		 *Intel ICX SPR EMR GNR
> > +		 *IIO MISC Control (IIOMISCCTRL_1_5_0_CFG) — Offset 1C0h
> > +		 *bit 2:Enable 1K (EN1K)
> > +		 *This bit when set, enables 1K granularity for I/O space decode
> > +		 *in each of the virtual P2P bridges
> > +		 *corresponding to root ports, and DMI ports.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (en1k & 0x4)
> > +			bridge->io_window_1k = 1;
> > +		}
> 
> I still think this is not going to work because I don't want this kind
> of device-specific clutter in this generic path. The pcibios_*
> interfaces are history that we'd like to get rid of also, but it would
> be better than putting it here.

Do you think it should be putted to the pci_bios* interface?

And if there is no suitable place to apply this patch, 
then let's just ignore this issue.

> 
> Please follow english conventions as much as you can, e.g., space
> after "*" in comments, space after period at end of sentence,
> capitalize first word of sentence, blank line between paragraphs.
> Most of this you can see by looking at other comments.
> 

Thank you sincerely for your help with my first patch commitment.

> >  		pci_read_bridge_io(bridge, &res, true);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> >