lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 16:28:03 +0200
From: Luigi Leonardi via B4 Relay <devnull+luigi.leonardi.outlook.com@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, 
 Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>, 
 Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH PATCH net-next v2 2/2] vsock/virtio: avoid enqueue packets
 when work queue is empty

From: Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>

Introduce an optimization in virtio_transport_send_pkt:
when the work queue (send_pkt_queue) is empty the packet is
put directly in the virtqueue reducing latency.

In the following benchmark (pingpong mode) the host sends
a payload to the guest and waits for the same payload back.

All vCPUs pinned individually to pCPUs.
vhost process pinned to a pCPU
fio process pinned both inside the host and the guest system.

Host CPU: Intel i7-10700KF CPU @ 3.80GHz
Tool: Fio version 3.37-56
Env: Phys host + L1 Guest
Payload: 512
Runtime-per-test: 50s
Mode: pingpong (h-g-h)
Test runs: 50
Type: SOCK_STREAM

Before (Linux 6.8.11)
------
mean(1st percentile):    380.56 ns
mean(overall):           780.83 ns
mean(99th percentile):  8300.24 ns

After
------
mean(1st percentile):   370.59 ns
mean(overall):          720.66 ns
mean(99th percentile): 7600.27 ns

Same setup, using 4K payload:

Before (Linux 6.8.11)
------
mean(1st percentile):    458.84 ns
mean(overall):          1650.17 ns
mean(99th percentile): 42240.68 ns

After
------
mean(1st percentile):    450.12 ns
mean(overall):          1460.84 ns
mean(99th percentile): 37632.45 ns

virtqueue.

Throughput: iperf-vsock

Before (Linux 6.8.11)
G2H 28.7 Gb/s

After
G2H 40.8 Gb/s

The performance improvement is related to this optimization,
I checked that each packet was put directly on the vq
avoiding the work queue.

Co-developed-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pinna <marco.pinn95@...il.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index a74083d28120..3815aa8d956b 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
+	bool use_worker = true;
 	int len = skb->len;
 
 	hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
@@ -234,8 +235,41 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb))
 		atomic_inc(&vsock->queued_replies);
 
-	virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail(&vsock->send_pkt_queue, skb);
-	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
+	/* If the workqueue (send_pkt_queue) is empty there is no need to enqueue the packet.
+	 * Just put it on the virtqueue using virtio_transport_send_skb.
+	 */
+	if (skb_queue_empty_lockless(&vsock->send_pkt_queue)) {
+		bool restart_rx = false;
+		struct virtqueue *vq;
+		int ret;
+
+		/* Inside RCU, can't sleep! */
+		ret = mutex_trylock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+		if (unlikely(ret == 0))
+			goto out_worker;
+
+		/* Driver is being removed, no need to enqueue the packet */
+		if (!vsock->tx_run)
+			goto out_rcu;
+
+		vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
+
+		if (!virtio_transport_send_skb(skb, vq, vsock, &restart_rx)) {
+			use_worker = false;
+			virtqueue_kick(vq);
+		}
+
+		mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
+		if (restart_rx)
+			queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
+	}
+
+out_worker:
+	if (use_worker) {
+		virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail(&vsock->send_pkt_queue, skb);
+		queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
+	}
 
 out_rcu:
 	rcu_read_unlock();

-- 
2.45.2



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ