linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/5] x86/vdso: Fix function reference in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 16:47:56 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
 Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] x86/vdso: Fix function reference in comment

Replace the reference to the non-existent function arch_vdso_cycles_valid()
by the proper function arch_vdso_cycles_ok().

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
index 0ef36190abe6..b2d2df026f6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
@@ -328,9 +328,8 @@ static __always_inline u64 vdso_calc_ns(const struct vdso_data *vd, u64 cycles,
 	 * due to unsigned comparison.
 	 *
 	 * Due to the MSB/Sign-bit being used as invalid marker (see
-	 * arch_vdso_cycles_valid() above), the effective mask is S64_MAX,
-	 * but that case is also unlikely and will also take the unlikely path
-	 * here.
+	 * arch_vdso_cycles_ok() above), the effective mask is S64_MAX, but that
+	 * case is also unlikely and will also take the unlikely path here.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(delta > vd->max_cycles)) {
 		/*

-- 
2.39.2