[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZoIVuvIBIYFFuRX3@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:34:34 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, john.g.garry@...cle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de, p.raghav@...sung.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com, cl@...amperecomputing.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size
support
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:44:20AM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
>
> Page cache now has the ability to have a minimum order when allocating
> a folio which is a prerequisite to add support for block size > page
> size.
>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
> ---
> @hch and @Dave I have retained the min_folio_order to be in the inode
> struct as the discussion about moving this to xfs_mount is still open.
>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 5 +++++
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h | 3 +++
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 6 ++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 1 -
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
all looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists