[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZoLbk3HjrPRfBNVg@p14s>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:13:00AM -0500, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> On 6/28/24 14:58, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > > This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is
> > > asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and
> > > halted == 0.
> > > In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead
> > > of a mismatched mode.
> > >
> > Your assessment seems to be correct. That said I'd like to have an RB or a TB
> > from someone in the TI delegation - guys please have a look.
> Agree with Richard's assessment, and the proposed fix looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by:
> Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
I have applied this patch, no need to send it again.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists