lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGtrtFNxDWtuADA4oOHhZJ=dJZcGaJ1XLFJt4fe4Xp=pTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:31:27 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, jgg@...pe.ca, 
	jsnitsel@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, 
	quic_c_gdjako@...cinc.com, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, 
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup

On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 4:01 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/28/2024 9:14 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 8:10 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
> > <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/28/2024 7:47 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 7:05 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
> >>> <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
> >>>> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
> >>>> sequence as per request.
> >>>>
> >>>> This will be used by GPU to setup the PRR bit and related
> >>>> configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
> >>>> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
> >>>>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>    drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h      |  2 ++
> >>>>    include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h           |  6 +++++-
> >>>>    3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>> index bd101a161d04..64571a1c47b8 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >>>>    #define PREFETCH_SHALLOW       (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >>>>    #define PREFETCH_MODERATE      (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >>>>    #define PREFETCH_DEEP          (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >>>> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR          (1 << 5)
> >>>>
> >>>>    static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
> >>>>           { 0x0800, 0x04e0, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
> >>>> @@ -235,6 +236,27 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
> >>>>           arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +       struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
> >>>> +       struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> >>>> +       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> >>>> +       u32 reg = 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
> >>>> +                               smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
> >>>> +                               smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       reg =  arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> >>>> +       reg &= ~GFX_ACTLR_PRR;
> >>>> +       if (set)
> >>>> +               reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, 1);
> >>>> +       arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> nit, extra line
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ack, will remove this. Thanks for pointing out.
> >>
> >>> Also, if you passed a `struct page *` instead, then you could drop the
> >>> bool param, ie. passing NULL for the page would disable PRR.  But I
> >>> can go either way if others have a strong preference for phys_addr_t.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Oh okay, this looks simple to reset the prr bit.
> >> But since this page is allocated and is used inside gfx driver
> >> before being utilized for prr bit operation, would it be safe for
> >> drm/gfx driver to keep a reference to this page in smmu driver?
> >>
> >> Since we only need the page address for configuring the
> >> CFG_UADDR/CFG_LADDR registers so passed the phys_addr_t.
> >
> > I don't think the smmu driver needs to keep a reference to the page..
> > we can just say it is the responsibility of the drm driver to call
> > set_prr(NULL) before freeing the page
> >
>
> That makes sense. If we go by this NULL page method to disable the PRR,
> we would have to set the address registers to reset value as well.
>
> The sequence would be like the following as per my understaning:
> - Check if it's NULL page
> - Set the PRR_CFG_UADDR/PRR_CFG_LADDR to reset values i.e - 0x0 for
>    these registers
> - Reset the PRR bit in actlr register
>
> Similar to this snippet:
>
> #PRR_RESET_ADDR 0x0
>
> --------------
> reg =  arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> reg &= ~GFX_ACTLR_PRR;
> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>
> if (!prr_page) {
>         writel_relaxed(PRR_RESET_ADDR,
>                         smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
>         writel_relaxed(PRR_RESET_ADDR),
>                          smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
>         return;
> }
>
>
> writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_to_phys(prr_page)),
>                 smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
>
> writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_to_phys(prr_page)),
>                 smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
>
> reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, 1);
> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> -----------------
>
> If looks good, will implement the same in next version.

yeah, that looks like it could work..

you probably don't need to zero out the PRR_CFG_*ADDR when disabling,
and probably could avoid double writing ACTLR, but that is getting
into bikeshedding

BR,
-R

>
> Thanks & regards,
> Bibek
>
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >>> Otherwise, lgtm
> >>>
> >>> BR,
> >>> -R
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks & regards,
> >> Bibek
> >>
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>    #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
> >>>>
> >>>>    static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
> >>>> @@ -407,6 +429,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >>>>           priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
> >>>>           priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> >>>>           priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
> >>>> +       priv->set_prr = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr;
> >>>>
> >>>>           actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
> >>>>           if (!actlrvar)
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >>>> index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >>>> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
> >>>>    #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M               BIT(0)
> >>>>
> >>>>    #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR              0x4
> >>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR     0x6008
> >>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR     0x600C
> >>>>
> >>>>    #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME             0x8
> >>>>    #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE      BIT(0)
> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >>>> index c637e0997f6d..d6e2ca9f8d8c 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >>>> @@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
> >>>>     *                 before set_ttbr0_cfg().  If stalling on fault is enabled,
> >>>>     *                 the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
> >>>>     * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
> >>>> - *
> >>>> + * @set_prr:      Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
> >>>> + *                 ACTLR register bits, currently used to configure
> >>>> + *                 Partially-Resident-Region (PRR) feature's
> >>>> + *                 setup and reset sequence as requested.
> >>>>     *
> >>>>     * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
> >>>>     * the GPU's SMMU instance.  This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
> >>>> @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
> >>>>        void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
> >>>>        void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
> >>>>        void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
> >>>> +    void (*set_prr)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
> >>>>    };
> >>>>
> >>>>    #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.34.1
> >>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ