[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240701223148.3798365-4-michael.roth@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:31:48 -0500
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
To: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<jroedel@...e.de>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>, <pgonda@...gle.com>,
<ashish.kalra@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
<liam.merwick@...cle.com>, Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: SEV: Provide support for SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
Version 2 of GHCB specification added support for the SNP Extended Guest
Request Message NAE event. This event serves a nearly identical purpose
to the previously-added SNP_GUEST_REQUEST event, but for certain message
types it allows the guest to supply a buffer to be used for additional
information in some cases.
Currently the GHCB spec only defines extended handling of this sort in
the case of attestation requests, where the additional buffer is used to
supply a table of certificate data corresponding to the attestion
report's signing key. Support for this extended handling will require
additional KVM APIs to handle coordinating with userspace.
Whether or not the hypervisor opts to provide this certificate data is
optional. However, support for processing SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST
GHCB requests is required by the GHCB 2.0 specification for SNP guests,
so for now implement a stub implementation that provides an empty
certificate table to the guest if it supplies an additional buffer, but
otherwise behaves identically to SNP_GUEST_REQUEST.
Reviewed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 190ee758dd6a..d85b724ce2ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -3401,6 +3401,7 @@ static int sev_es_validate_vmgexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
goto vmgexit_err;
break;
case SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST:
+ case SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST:
if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm) ||
!PAGE_ALIGNED(control->exit_info_1) ||
!PAGE_ALIGNED(control->exit_info_2) ||
@@ -4070,6 +4071,58 @@ static int snp_handle_guest_req(struct vcpu_svm *svm, gpa_t req_gpa, gpa_t resp_
return ret;
}
+static int snp_handle_ext_guest_req(struct vcpu_svm *svm, gpa_t req_gpa, gpa_t resp_gpa)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = svm->vcpu.kvm;
+ u8 msg_type;
+
+ if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (kvm_read_guest(kvm, req_gpa + offsetof(struct snp_guest_msg_hdr, msg_type),
+ &msg_type, 1))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ /*
+ * As per GHCB spec, requests of type MSG_REPORT_REQ also allow for
+ * additional certificate data to be provided alongside the attestation
+ * report via the guest-provided data pages indicated by RAX/RBX. The
+ * certificate data is optional and requires additional KVM enablement
+ * to provide an interface for userspace to provide it, but KVM still
+ * needs to be able to handle extended guest requests either way. So
+ * provide a stub implementation that will always return an empty
+ * certificate table in the guest-provided data pages.
+ */
+ if (msg_type == SNP_MSG_REPORT_REQ) {
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
+ u64 data_npages;
+ gpa_t data_gpa;
+
+ if (!kvm_ghcb_rax_is_valid(svm) || !kvm_ghcb_rbx_is_valid(svm))
+ goto request_invalid;
+
+ data_gpa = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
+ data_npages = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
+
+ if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(data_gpa))
+ goto request_invalid;
+
+ /*
+ * As per GHCB spec (see "SNP Extended Guest Request"), the
+ * certificate table is terminated by 24-bytes of zeroes.
+ */
+ if (data_npages && kvm_clear_guest(kvm, data_gpa, 24))
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ return snp_handle_guest_req(svm, req_gpa, resp_gpa);
+
+request_invalid:
+ ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_1(svm->sev_es.ghcb, 2);
+ ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, GHCB_ERR_INVALID_INPUT);
+ return 1; /* resume guest */
+}
+
static int sev_handle_vmgexit_msr_protocol(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
@@ -4347,6 +4400,9 @@ int sev_handle_vmgexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
case SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST:
ret = snp_handle_guest_req(svm, control->exit_info_1, control->exit_info_2);
break;
+ case SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST:
+ ret = snp_handle_ext_guest_req(svm, control->exit_info_1, control->exit_info_2);
+ break;
case SVM_VMGEXIT_UNSUPPORTED_EVENT:
vcpu_unimpl(vcpu,
"vmgexit: unsupported event - exit_info_1=%#llx, exit_info_2=%#llx\n",
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists