[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2846186f-a0e1-4cd3-85bf-f029053bf98c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:14:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: add
bindings"
On 28/06/2024 18:10, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Switch from one sub-node per functionality in the system-controller to a
> single node representing the entire OLB instance. This is the
> recommended approach for controllers handling many different
> functionalities; it is a single controller and should be represented by
> a single devicetree node.
>
> The clock bindings is removed and all properties will be described by:
> soc/mobileye/mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
This is v1, so where did this happen?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists