[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9036f912-bc84-9179-5eb5-270fee6f8cb9@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 04:59:05 -0500
From: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Thomas
Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Thomas Richard
<thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce suspend to ram support
On 6/21/24 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Richard Genoud (4):
> remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection
> remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce PM suspend/resume handlers
> remoteproc: k3-r5: k3_r5_rproc_stop: code reorder
> remoteproc: k3-r5: support for graceful stop of remote cores
IMO, the patches are better reordered as below (since there is a LPM
rearch in progress)
patch1 - Independent of other patches and is clearly a bug fix.
patch3,4 - Support for graceful shutdown. A separate feature used by
customers wanting to change FW at runtime and is independent of
suspend/resume.
patch 2 - suspend/resume handlers..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists