[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240701123137.GF20127@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:31:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] perf: Shrink the size of the recursion counter.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> There are four recursion counter, one for each context. The type of the
> counter is `int' but the counter is used as `bool' since it is only
> incremented if zero.
>
> Reduce the type of the recursion counter to an unsigned char, keep the
> increment/ decrement operation.
Does this actually matter? Aren't u8 memops encoded by longer
instructions etc..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists