linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: Add Arm Network-on-Chip PMU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:36:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jialong.yang@...ngroup.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: Add Arm Network-on-Chip PMU driver

Hi Robin,

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 01:29:51PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> 
> Somewhat later than hoped (sorry!), now that it's finally had the chance
> for enough testing to flush out all the silly bugs, here's the NI-700
> driver I've had kicking around in various forms for the last 18 months.
> I squashed in NI-710AE support since that appeared in the meantime and
> the differences are minimal, however I have not felt compelled to go
> back and genericise all the original NI-700 references. I don't think
> I'm giving too much away to say that there will be further new product
> support to add in future, so I will be back with more soon enough.
> 
> Note that the driver patch depends on the the cpumask_any_and_but()
> addition queued in arm64/for-next/perf.

I left some minor comments on the driver code, but I think this probably
needs a respin anyway as the binding is still pending an Ack from the
DT folks.

Will