linux-kernel - Re: Mainline: v6.10-rc6 boot failed across all arm64 devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu2GQXEWECWHi0LZZ_UsMSPGaJ1ORKTR8k_E_LuYteLAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:12:48 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Mainline: v6.10-rc6 boot failed across all arm64 devices

Hi Will,

On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 18:17, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> This report is quite hard to follow, so just some minor comments which
> you can hopefully take on board to improve things in future:
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 05:28:29PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The mainline kernel v6.10-rc6 boot failed across all arm64 devices and
> > qemu-arm64 and no crash log found (earlycon) did not help.
> >
> > But the defconfig builds boot PASS.
> >
> > The boot problem is with defconfig + Extra Kconfigs and builds links
> > provided in the bottom of this email.
>
> If I go to the bottom of the email, I see this:
>
> > Links:
> > -----
> >  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2idWrbdtwMqpD9wx7IPRGJ7Dsx3/
> >  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2idWrYDposdlRsS4jwF916a0qGE/
> >  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.10-rc6/testrun/24473346/suite/boot/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod/history/
> >  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.10-rc6/testrun/24473903/suite/boot/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture/history/
>
> but these are just random links without any context. The first two appear
> to be kernel build artifacts, but I can't tell:
>
>   - Are both "good" or "bad"?

Both are bad. which failed to boot from these build artifacts.
Which is the location of storage of Build artifacts and build logs,
Image, Vmlinux.

>   - What is the difference between them?
 one build is pointing to Rcu Torture test build,
  - CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m ++Kconfigs

other one is pointing to libgpiod build,
  - CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y ++Kconfigs

>
> If I look at the first of the last two links, click through to the
> "qemu-arm64" target and follow the "job_url" link, then I end up at:
>
>   https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2idWuAb51mcz7lO1BAj8Aw0BrNY
>
> which has some empty logs and something from "TuxRun" which says:
>
>   {"error": "File not found"}

Due to missing boot log this file is empty.

>
> It's very hard to know what to do with this :/


Sorry for the trouble.
I will add more detailed information next to each link in my next report.

>
> Will

- Naresh