linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the vfs-brauner, ftrace trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:07:32 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Christian Göttsche
 <cgzones@...glemail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel
 Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the
 vfs-brauner, ftrace trees

Hi Jason,

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:43:17 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:56 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >  +466   n32     removexattrat                   sys_removexattrat
> > ++468   n32     vgetrandom_alloc                sys_vgetrandom_alloc  
> 
> Wondering why 467 was skipped.

It is being used by the uretprobe system call on x86 and asm-generic.

> Also, any chance you can let me keep 463 and shift the others (unless
> Christian objects)? Or does it not really matter anyway because Linus
> is gonna merge this how he wants, separately from what you do in
> -next?

Well, the other new syscalls have been in -next for some time, so I
don't really want to move them (and it would make more work for me :-)).

As you say, Linus will just merge these depending on his own ordering.
However, if you switch to 468/568, then he will probably not change it.
I was also hoping that the uretprobe syscall would change to 467 for
the same reason.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped