linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240702171515.6780-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:15:14 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
CC: Meng Li <li.meng@....com>, Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>, "open list:AMD
 PSTATE DRIVER" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, open list
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dhananjay Ugwekar
	<Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore

If a system is using preferred cores the highest perf will be inconsistent
as it can change from system events.

Skip the checks for it.

Fixes: e571a5e2068e ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate preferred core ranking dynamically")
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index 66b73c308ce6..b7318669485e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -160,14 +160,17 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 			lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
 		}
 
-		if ((highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf)) ||
-			(nominal_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf)) ||
+		if (highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf) && !cpudata->hw_prefcore) {
+			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d highest perf doesn't match\n",
+				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->highest_perf);
+			goto skip_test;
+		}
+		if ((nominal_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf)) ||
 			(lowest_nonlinear_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf)) ||
 			(lowest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf))) {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
-			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d nominal=%d %d lowest_nonlinear=%d %d lowest=%d %d, they should be equal!\n",
-				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->highest_perf,
-				nominal_perf, cpudata->nominal_perf,
+			pr_err("%s cpu%d nominal=%d %d lowest_nonlinear=%d %d lowest=%d %d, they should be equal!\n",
+				__func__, cpu, nominal_perf, cpudata->nominal_perf,
 				lowest_nonlinear_perf, cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf,
 				lowest_perf, cpudata->lowest_perf);
 			goto skip_test;
-- 
2.43.0