[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240702112454.408757f7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:24:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Adrián Moreno
<amorenoz@...hat.com>, Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, echaudro@...hat.com, dev@...nvswitch.org, Donald
Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Pravin
B Shelar <pshelar@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 05/10] net: openvswitch: add psample action
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 20:16:51 +0200 Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 7/2/24 20:06, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:53:01 +0200 Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >> Or create a simple static function and mark all the arguments as unused,
> >> which kind of compliant to the coding style, but the least pretty.
> >
> > To be clear - kernel explicitly disables warnings about unused
> > arguments. Unused arguments are not a concern.
>
> OK. Good to know.
>
> Though I think, the '12) Macros, Enums and RTL' section of the
> coding style document needs some rephrasing in that case.
Do you mean something like:
diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
index 7e768c65aa92..0516b7009688 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling functions.
} while (0)
Function-like macros with unused parameters should be replaced by static
-inline functions to avoid the issue of unused variables:
+inline functions to avoid the issue of unused variables in the caller:
.. code-block:: c
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists