[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171994588115.2906516.12700202643238023170.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:44:57 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
acme@...hat.com,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:48:21 +0530, Madadi Vineeth Reddy wrote:
> Currently, the -r/--repeat option accepts values from 0 and complains
> for -1. The help section specifies:
> -r, --repeat <n> repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)
>
> The -r -1 option raises an error because replay_repeat is defined as
> an unsigned int.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists