lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:42:48 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, 
	lkp@...el.com, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [lockref] d042dae6ad: unixbench.throughput
 -33.7% regression

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 13:33, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com> wrote:
>
> If you are politely by lkml standards suggesting I should probably drop
> the idea due to unforseen complexities

Oh, absolutely not. I'd love to see how nasty - or not nasty - the
patch would end up being. I think it would be very interesting.

I'm just explaining why _I_ never got around to it.

I do think that the 'stat()' family of syscalls are some of the most
critical system calls out there. And while I suspect the benchmarks
that stat the same file over and over in parallel are worthless, if we
can do 'stat()' without ever even dirtying the dentry at all, that
would be absolutely lovely.

           Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ