lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:45:58 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs

Quoting David Gow (2024-06-13 00:50:10)
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 06:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> > are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> > test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> > with fake platform devices and device nodes via overlays compiled into
> > the kernel image.
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>
> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> > ---
> 
> This is looking good from my point of view, and passes on my test
> setup. One minor question (do we need both to select OF_OVERLAY and
> skip if it's not enabled?), but otherwise:

We don't need to skip if OF_OVERLAY isn't set because it's forced on for
the test. I'll remove it, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ