[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa6e93bd-aba2-4e4d-bce9-04e818ac25ed@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:26:39 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: Use dev_err_probe in every error path
in probe
Il 02/07/24 07:57, Viresh Kumar ha scritto:
> On 28-06-24, 15:48, NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -629,11 +630,9 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int cpu, ret;
>>
>> data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (!data) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> - "failed to get mtk cpufreq platform data\n");
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> - }
>> + if (!data)
>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV,
>
> What's the point of calling dev_err_probe() when we know for sure that
> the error isn't EPROBE_DEFER ?
>
Logging consistency, that's all; the alternative would be to rewrite the dev_err()
messages to be consistent with what dev_err_probe() says, so that'd be
dev_err("error %pe: (message)");
>> + "failed to get mtk cpufreq platform data\n");
>>
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> info = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(cpu);
>> @@ -643,24 +642,21 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!info) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to allocate dvfs_info\n");
>
By the way, forgot to point that out in my former review: to make it shorter,
instead of "ret = -ENOMEM; dev_err_probe()" you can write it as...
ret = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENOMEM, ".... message");
Cheers,
Angelo
> Same here.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists