lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560c58be-4741-49c3-b47b-b154f564d148@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:39:09 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, alexs@...nel.org,
 Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, minchan@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
 senozhatsky@...omium.org, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] mm/zsmalloc: add zpdesc memory descriptor for
 zswap.zpool



On 7/1/24 9:42 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> [..]
>>>> +       union {
>>>> +               /* Next zpdescs in a zspage in zsmalloc zpool */
>>>> +               struct zpdesc *next;
>>>> +               /* For huge zspage in zsmalloc zpool */
>>>> +               unsigned long handle;
>>>> +       };
>>>> +       struct zspage *zspage;
>>>
>>> There was a discussion with Yosry on including memcg_data on zpdesc
>>> even if it's not used at the moment.
>>>
>>> Maybe you can look at:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAB=+i9Quz9iP2-Lq=oQfKVVnzPDtOaKMm=hUPbnRg5hRxH+qaA@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> Thanks for notice.
>> The memcg_data isn't used for zpdesc. And I have a bit confusion since Yosry said: "I think to drop memcg_data we need to enlighten the code that ...". So we actually don't need to have this unused member, is this right, Yosry?
> 
> I think we need to have it, at least for now. When the pages are
> freed, put_page() -> folio_put() -> __folio_put() will call
> mem_cgroup_uncharge(). The latter will call folio_memcg() (which reads
> folio->memcg_data) to figure out if uncharging needs to be done.
> 
> There are also other similar code paths that will check
> folio->memcg_data. It is currently expected to be present for all
> folios. So until we have custom code paths per-folio type for
> allocation/freeing/etc, we need to keep folio->memcg_data present and
> properly initialized.

Hi Yosry,

Many thanks for detailed comments and requirements! 
I'm going to add this member in next version, maybe tomorrow, unless there are more comments for this patchset. :)

Thank a lot!
Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ