linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/configs: Update defconfig with now user-visible CONFIG_FSL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:33:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Esben Haabendal
 <esben@...nix.com>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
 "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/configs: Update defconfig with now
 user-visible CONFIG_FSL_IFC

On 02/07/2024 14:01, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> writes:
>> On 30/05/2024 16:46, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_FSL_IFC now being user-visible, and thus changed from a select
>>> to depends in CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_IFC, the dependencies needs to be
>>> selected in defconfigs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
>>
>> Anyone is going to pick this up?
> 
> Doesn't it need to be merged along with patch 1?

Well, it's late to talk about this... I replied 3 weeks ago, when taking
the first patch, that I don't consider defconfig as a guaranteed feature
thus no hard-bisectability requirement. Three weeks and no comments on
that, so no, this does not have to be merged with patch 1.

The best if it goes the same cycle, though. So for v6.11.

Best regards,
Krzysztof