lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue,  2 Jul 2024 16:00:06 +0100
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-dev@...lia.com,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/numa_balancing: Teach mpol_to_str about the balancing mode

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>

Since balancing mode was added in
bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes"),
it was possible to set this mode but it wouldn't be shown in
/proc/<pid>/numa_maps since there was no support for it in the
mpol_to_str() helper.

Furthermore, because the balancing mode sets the MPOL_F_MORON flag, it
would be displayed as 'default' due a workaround introduced a few years
earlier in
8790c71a18e5 ("mm/mempolicy.c: fix mempolicy printing in numa_maps").

To tidy this up we implement two changes:

First we introduce a new internal flag MPOL_F_KERNEL and with it mark the
kernel's internal default and fallback policies (for tasks and/or VMAs
with no explicit policy set). By doing this we generalise the current
special casing and replace the incorrect 'default' with the correct
'bind'.

Secondly, we add a string representation and corresponding handling for
MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING. We do this by adding a sparse mapping array of
flags to names. With the sparseness being the downside, but with the
advantage of generalising and removing the "policy" from flags display.

End result:

$ numactl -b -m 0-1,3 cat /proc/self/numa_maps
555559580000 bind=balancing:0-1,3 file=/usr/bin/cat mapped=3 active=0 N0=3 kernelpagesize_kB=16
...

v2:
 * Fully fix by introducing MPOL_F_KERNEL.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>
Fixes: bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes")
References: 8790c71a18e5 ("mm/mempolicy.c: fix mempolicy printing in numa_maps")
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h |  1 +
 mm/mempolicy.c                 | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
index 1f9bb10d1a47..bcf56ce9603b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ enum {
 #define MPOL_F_SHARED  (1 << 0)	/* identify shared policies */
 #define MPOL_F_MOF	(1 << 3) /* this policy wants migrate on fault */
 #define MPOL_F_MORON	(1 << 4) /* Migrate On protnone Reference On Node */
+#define MPOL_F_KERNEL   (1 << 5) /* Kernel's internal policy */
 
 /*
  * These bit locations are exposed in the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index aec756ae5637..8ecc6d9f100a 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ enum zone_type policy_zone = 0;
 static struct mempolicy default_policy = {
 	.refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(1), /* never free it */
 	.mode = MPOL_LOCAL,
+	.flags = MPOL_F_KERNEL,
 };
 
 static struct mempolicy preferred_node_policy[MAX_NUMNODES];
@@ -3095,7 +3096,7 @@ void __init numa_policy_init(void)
 		preferred_node_policy[nid] = (struct mempolicy) {
 			.refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
 			.mode = MPOL_PREFERRED,
-			.flags = MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON,
+			.flags = MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON | MPOL_F_KERNEL,
 			.nodes = nodemask_of_node(nid),
 		};
 	}
@@ -3150,6 +3151,12 @@ static const char * const policy_modes[] =
 	[MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY]  = "prefer (many)",
 };
 
+static const char * const policy_flags[] = {
+	[ilog2(MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)] = "static",
+	[ilog2(MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)] = "relative",
+	[ilog2(MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING)] = "balancing",
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
 /**
  * mpol_parse_str - parse string to mempolicy, for tmpfs mpol mount option.
@@ -3293,17 +3300,18 @@ int mpol_parse_str(char *str, struct mempolicy **mpol)
  * @pol:  pointer to mempolicy to be formatted
  *
  * Convert @pol into a string.  If @buffer is too short, truncate the string.
- * Recommend a @maxlen of at least 32 for the longest mode, "interleave", the
- * longest flag, "relative", and to display at least a few node ids.
+ * Recommend a @maxlen of at least 42 for the longest mode, "weighted
+ * interleave", the longest flag, "balancing", and to display at least a few
+ * node ids.
  */
 void mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct mempolicy *pol)
 {
 	char *p = buffer;
 	nodemask_t nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 	unsigned short mode = MPOL_DEFAULT;
-	unsigned short flags = 0;
+	unsigned long flags = 0;
 
-	if (pol && pol != &default_policy && !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_MORON)) {
+	if (!(pol->flags & MPOL_F_KERNEL)) {
 		mode = pol->mode;
 		flags = pol->flags;
 	}
@@ -3328,15 +3336,25 @@ void mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct mempolicy *pol)
 	p += snprintf(p, maxlen, "%s", policy_modes[mode]);
 
 	if (flags & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS) {
-		p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, "=");
+		unsigned int bit, cnt = 0;
 
-		/*
-		 * Currently, the only defined flags are mutually exclusive
-		 */
-		if (flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)
-			p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, "static");
-		else if (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)
-			p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, "relative");
+		for_each_set_bit(bit, &flags, ARRAY_SIZE(policy_flags)) {
+			if (bit <= ilog2(MPOL_F_KERNEL))
+				continue;
+
+			if (cnt == 0)
+				p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, "=");
+			else
+				p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, ",");
+
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!policy_flags[bit]))
+				p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p, "bit%u",
+					      bit);
+			else
+				p += snprintf(p, buffer + maxlen - p,
+					      policy_flags[bit]);
+			cnt++;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (!nodes_empty(nodes))
-- 
2.44.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ