| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cf4a9281-a28b-48f6-a53b-27df01980af6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:08:37 +0800
From: Junhui Liu <liujh2818@...il.com>
To: d1581209858@...e.com
Cc: aou@...s.berkeley.edu, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
inochiama@...look.com, jassisinghbrar@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh@...nel.org,
unicorn_wang@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mailbox: sophgo: add mailbox driver for cv18x SoCs
Hi Yuntao,
On 2024/6/18 23:12, Yuntao Dai wrote:
> Add mailbox controller driver for cv18x SoCs, tested on mailbox-test
> client.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Dai <d1581209858@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 11 ++
> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/mailbox/cv1800b-mailbox.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/cv1800b-mailbox.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 3b8842c4a..4e5593861 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -286,4 +286,15 @@ config QCOM_IPCC
> acts as an interrupt controller for receiving interrupts from clients.
> Say Y here if you want to build this driver.
>
> +config CV1800B_MBOX
> + tristate "cv1800b mailbox"
> + depends on OF
> + depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Mailbox driver implementation for Sophgo cv180x SoCs. This driver
> + can be used to send message between different processors in SoC. Any
> + processer can write data in a channel, and set co-responding register
> + to raise interrupt to notice another processor, and it is allowed to
> + send data to itself.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index 5cf2f54de..71f0f746e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -62,3 +62,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SUN6I_MSGBOX) += sun6i-msgbox.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_MBOX) += sprd-mailbox.o
> better
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IPCC) += qcom-ipcc.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CV1800B_MBOX) += cv1800b-mailbox.o
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/cv1800b-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/cv1800b-mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..8ef2a5492
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/cv1800b-mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kfifo.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN 0x0008
> +#define MAILBOX_DONE_OFFSET 0x0002
> +#define MAILBOX_CONTEXT_SIZE 0x0040
> +#define MAILBOX_CONTEXT_OFFSET 0x0400
> +
> +#define MBOX_EN_REG(cpu) (cpu << 2)
> +#define MBOX_DONE_REG(cpu) ((cpu << 2) + MAILBOX_DONE_OFFSET)
> +
> +#define MBOX_SET_CLR_REG(cpu) (0x10 + (cpu << 4))
> +#define MBOX_SET_INT_REG(cpu) (0x18 + (cpu << 4))
> +
> +#define MBOX_SET_REG 0x60
> +
> +struct cv1800b_mbox {
> + struct mbox_controller mbox;
> + struct mbox_chan chans[MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN];
> + u64 *content[MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN];
> + void __iomem *mbox_base;
> + int sendto;
> + int recvid;
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t cv1800b_mbox_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct cv1800b_mbox *mbox = (struct cv1800b_mbox *)dev_id;
> + size_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN; i++) {
> + if (mbox->content[i]) {
> + mbox_chan_received_data(&mbox->chans[i],
> + mbox->content[i]);
I tested this driver but met "NULL pointer dereference" Oops here
when I sent message from the c906l core without binding clients.
I think maybe it's better to add a check here, like:
struct mbox_chan *chan = &mbox->chans[i];
if (chan->cl) {
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, mbox->content[i]);
}
Best,
Junhui Liu
> + mbox->content[i] = NULL;
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> + }
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t cv1800b_mbox_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct cv1800b_mbox *mbox = (struct cv1800b_mbox *)dev_id;
> + u8 set, valid;
> + u64 *addr;
> + size_t i;
> +
> + set = readb(mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_SET_INT_REG(mbox->recvid));
> +
> + if (!set)
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN; i++) {
> + valid = set & (1 << i);
> + addr = (u64 *)(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_CONTEXT_OFFSET) + i;
> + if (valid) {
> + mbox->content[i] = addr;
> + writeb(valid, mbox->mbox_base +
> + MBOX_SET_CLR_REG(mbox->recvid));
> + writeb(~valid,
> + mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_EN_REG(mbox->recvid));
> + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static int cv1800b_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> + struct cv1800b_mbox *mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> + int idx = (int)chan->con_priv;
> + u8 en, valid;
> + u64 *addr = (u64 *)(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_CONTEXT_OFFSET) + idx;
> +
> + memcpy_toio(addr, data, 8);
> +
> + valid = 1 << idx;
> + writeb(valid, mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_SET_CLR_REG(mbox->sendto));
> + en = readb(mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_EN_REG(mbox->sendto));
> + writeb(en | valid, mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_EN_REG(mbox->sendto));
> + writeb(valid, mbox->mbox_base + MBOX_SET_REG);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool cv1800b_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops cv1800b_mbox_chan_ops = {
> + .send_data = cv1800b_mbox_send_data,
> + .last_tx_done = cv1800b_last_tx_done,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id cv1800b_mbox_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-mailbox", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cv1800b_mbox_of_match);
> +
> +static int cv1800b_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct cv1800b_mbox *mb;
> + int irq, idx, err, cpu;
> +
> + if (!dev->of_node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + mb = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mb), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mb->mbox_base = devm_of_iomap(dev, dev->of_node, 0, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(mb->mbox_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(mb->mbox_base),
> + "Failed to map resource\n");
> +
> + err = of_property_read_s32(dev->of_node, "sendto", &cpu);
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> + "Failed to find <sendto> in of_node\n");
> +
> + mb->sendto = cpu;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_s32(dev->of_node, "recvid", &cpu);
> + if (err) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> + "Failed to find <recvid> in of_node\n");
> + }
> + mb->recvid = cpu;
> +
> + mb->mbox.dev = dev;
> + mb->mbox.num_chans = MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN;
> + mb->mbox.chans = mb->chans;
> + mb->mbox.ops = &cv1800b_mbox_chan_ops;
> + mb->mbox.txdone_poll = true;
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "mailbox");
> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, cv1800b_mbox_irq,
> + cv1800b_mbox_isr, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), mb);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to register irq\n");
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < MAILBOX_MAX_CHAN; idx++)
> + mb->mbox.chans[idx].con_priv = (void *)idx;
> +
> + err = devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &mb->mbox);
> + if (err)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to register mailbox\n");
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mb);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver cv1800b_mbox_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "cv1800b-mbox",
> + .of_match_table = cv1800b_mbox_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = cv1800b_mbox_probe,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(cv1800b_mbox_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("cv1800b mailbox driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists