[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19074452940.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:26:49 +0200
From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>, <johannes.berg@...el.com>, <kees@...nel.org>, <a@...repo.ru>, <marcan@...can.st>, <quic_alokad@...cinc.com>, <zyytlz.wz@....com>, <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>, <duoming@....edu.cn>, <colin.i.king@...il.com>, <frankyl@...adcom.com>, <meuleman@...adcom.com>, <phaber@...adcom.com>, <linville@...driver.com>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev>, <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless 1/9] wifi: cfg80211: avoid garbage value of 'io_type' in brcmf_cfg80211_attach()
On July 2, 2024 5:37:10 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> writes:
>>
>>> On July 2, 2024 3:57:27 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 08:24:44PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
>>>>> brcmf_fil_cmd_int_get() reads the value of 'io_type' and passes it to
>>>>> brcmf_fil_cmd_data_get(). Initialize 'io_type' to avoid garbage value.
>>>>
>>>> Since you're going to be resending anyway, please delete the space char
>>>> from the start of the line.
>>>>
>>>> It's weird that brcmf_fil_cmd_data_get() uses the uninitialized data.
>>>> It looks like it just goes to great lengths to preserve the original
>>>> data in io_type... So it likely is harmless enough but still a strange
>>>> and complicated way write a no-op.
>>>
>>> Not sure if it helps, but I tried to explain the reason in response to
>>> patch 0 (cover letter).
>>
>> Would it make more sense to have just one patch? It's the same issue
>> anyway.
>
> The Fixes tags are different though. I'd probably leave them as
> separate patches just because of that.
Depending how you look at the problem those tags are wrong.
Regards,
Arend
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4219 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists