[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGLn_=vpXfCPaWXpeOEfUY3CJEWbp7TMOQb0A5XbGLAPZJ53jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:07:35 +0530
From: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: dw-mmio: update dw_spi_mmio_of_match struct
with thead
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:42:46PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > So, I will drop this patch.
> > In the next version (i.e. v2) of this patchset, do I need to include
> > the dt-binding patch as it is already in for-next.
>
> No, you do not need to include the binding.
Alright thanks for the clarification!
> > I am waiting for comments on the devicetree files before sending the
> > v2 (if required).
>
> I'll try to look at that today, not super sure if I wanna pick up more
> patches for that platform with "fixed-clock"s, but I'll comment that on
> the dts patch itself.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
Cheers,
Kanak Shilledar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists