linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/47] arm64: qcom: dts: add QCS9100 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7417fd8c-e852-45ee-bac9-d92921036e2f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 06:45:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, djakov@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
 sboyd@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
 davem@...emloft.net, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, will@...nel.org,
 joro@...tes.org, conor@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, amitk@...nel.org,
 thara.gopinath@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
 vkoul@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com
Cc: robimarko@...il.com, quic_gurus@...cinc.com,
 bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, kishon@...nel.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
 alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
 agross@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_tdas@...cinc.com,
 robin.murphy@....com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
 lukasz.luba@....com, quic_rjendra@...cinc.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
 quic_sibis@...cinc.com, otto.pflueger@...cue.de, quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com,
 luca@...tu.xyz, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, abel.vesa@...aro.org,
 bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 peppe.cavallaro@...com, joabreu@...opsys.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 ahalaney@...hat.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
 u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
 quic_cang@...cinc.com, danila@...xyga.com, quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com,
 mantas@...vices.com, athierry@...hat.com, quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com,
 quic_bjorande@...cinc.com, quic_msarkar@...cinc.com,
 quic_devipriy@...cinc.com, quic_tsoni@...cinc.com,
 quic_rgottimu@...cinc.com, quic_shashim@...cinc.com,
 quic_kaushalk@...cinc.com, quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com,
 quic_aiquny@...cinc.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/47] arm64: qcom: dts: add QCS9100 support

On 03/07/2024 05:56, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> Introduce support for the QCS9100 SoC device tree (DTSI) and the
> QCS9100 RIDE board DTS. The QCS9100 is a variant of the SA8775p.
> While the QCS9100 platform is still in the early design stage, the
> QCS9100 RIDE board is identical to the SA8775p RIDE board, except it
> mounts the QCS9100 SoC instead of the SA8775p SoC.

The same huge patchset, to huge number of recipients was sent twice.
First, sorry, this is way too big. Second, it has way too many
recipients, but this is partially a result of first point. Only
partially because you put here dozen of totally unrelated emails. Sorry,
that does not make even sense. See form letter at the end how this
works. Third, sending it to everyone twice is a way to annoy them off
twice... Fourth,

Please split your work and do not cc dozen of unrelated folks.

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might
happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof